Floor Deck Detailing Checklist Before Submittal

A comprehensive, field-tested checklist for structural engineers and detailers preparing floor deck shop drawings for construction review. Submitting a complete, coordinated package the first time prevents costly RFIs, revision cycles, and schedule delays. This guide walks through every critical checkpoint — from profile selection and structural coordination to connection details and code compliance — so your submittal lands clean.

Floor Deck Detailing Checklist Before Submittal
Floor Deck Submittals • Quality Control • Pre-Fabrication Review

Why Pre-Submittal Review Matters

Review Before Release

Catch the Problem Before
It Becomes a Delay

Detail
→
Review
→
Submit
01
Delay
Exposure
The Consequence

The Cost of an Incomplete Submittal

Incomplete or poorly coordinated floor deck submittals are one of the most common sources of delays in the structural steel phase. A single round-trip RFI can cost days or weeks on a fast-track schedule. Reviewers who find missing details, conflicting geometry, or unresolved connections will reject or heavily comment the package — sending it back to the detailer for correction before fabrication can begin.

The RFI Cycle

One Missing Detail Can Stop Fabrication

Missing Detail
→
Reviewer Comment
→
RFI / Revision
→
Fabrication Delay

Shop Drawing Verification

Step 1 — Deck Profile, Gauge &
Material Verification

The first checkpoint confirms that the deck specified in the structural drawings is exactly what is being detailed. Mismatches in profile depth, gauge, or steel grade are the most fundamental errors and the easiest to catch early.

VERIFY
✓
FIRST CHECKPOINT

Mismatches in Profile, Gauge, or Steel Grade Are the Most Fundamental Errors—and the Easiest to Catch Early

Confirm the deck profile designation matches the structural specification exactly. Specify the design gauge and confirm minimum delivered thickness per SDI tolerances. Confirm ASTM grade and galvanizing coating per project specification. Clearly differentiate composite deck (used with headed shear studs) from non-composite form deck. These four verifications form the foundation of a compliant shop drawing submittal.

PROFILE VERIFICATION

Confirm Deck Profile Designation

Verify the profile type (e.g., 2VLI, 3VLI, 1.5B, 3N) matches the structural specification sheet exactly. Different profiles share similar rib geometries but differ in section properties—substituting without EOR approval is a code non-conformance.

Exact match required: Profile designation on shop drawings must match structural specification exactly—no substitutions without EOR approval.
Section properties: Different profiles have different section properties even if rib geometries appear similar.
Documentation: Record the SDI designation and manufacturer catalog reference in the drawing title block.
GAUGE & THICKNESS

Gauge and Minimum Thickness

Specify the design gauge and confirm the minimum delivered thickness per SDI Table 1.2 tolerances. Note that 20-gauge and 22-gauge are common in composite floor systems, while heavier gauges (16–18) appear at cantilevers or heavily loaded bays.

SDI tolerances: Confirm minimum delivered thickness per SDI Table 1.2 tolerances—design gauge is not the same as minimum delivered thickness.
Common gauges: 20-gauge and 22-gauge are common in composite floor systems; 16–18 gauge at cantilevers or heavily loaded bays.
Explicit callout: The shop drawing must call out both the design thickness and the ASTM A1008 or A653 reference. Do not assume gauge—state it explicitly.
GRADE & COATING

Steel Grade and Coating

Confirm ASTM grade (typically Fy = 33 ksi for standard deck, 40 or 50 ksi for high-strength applications). Specify galvanizing—G-60 is common for interior floor deck; G-90 or prime-painted may be required in corrosive environments or where the deck will be exposed.

ASTM grade: Typically Fy = 33 ksi for standard deck; 40 or 50 ksi for high-strength applications. Confirm per structural specification.
Galvanizing: G-60 is common for interior floor deck; G-90 or prime-painted may be required in corrosive environments or where deck will be exposed.
Specification match: Coating must match the project specification, not just industry default.
COMPOSITE VS NON-COMPOSITE

Composite vs. Non-Composite Designation

Clearly differentiate composite deck (used with headed shear studs) from non-composite (form deck only). The plan sheets must label each bay consistently with the structural framing plan.

Clear differentiation: Composite deck is used with headed shear studs; non-composite is form deck only. These are not interchangeable.
Consistent labeling: Plan sheets must label each bay consistently with the structural framing plan.
Common error: Mixing composite and non-composite details in the same bay without EOR direction is a common submittal error that reviewers flag immediately.

Profile, Gauge & Material Verification Checklist

✓ Profile Designation Profile type (2VLI, 3VLI, 1.5B, 3N, etc.) matches structural specification exactly. SDI designation and manufacturer catalog reference recorded in title block.
✓ Gauge & Thickness Design gauge specified. Minimum delivered thickness confirmed per SDI Table 1.2 tolerances. ASTM A1008 or A653 reference called out explicitly.
✓ Steel Grade ASTM grade confirmed (Fy = 33 ksi standard; 40 or 50 ksi for high-strength). Matches structural specification, not industry default.
✓ Galvanizing/Coating G-60 for interior floor deck; G-90 or prime-painted for corrosive/exposed conditions. Coating matches project specification.
✓ Composite vs Non-Composite Composite deck (with shear studs) clearly differentiated from non-composite (form deck only). Each bay labeled consistently with structural framing plan.
✓ No Unauthorized Substitutions No profile, gauge, grade, or coating substitutions without EOR approval. All deviations flagged and approved before submittal.
COMMON SUBMITTAL ERROR

Mixing Composite and Non-Composite Details in the Same Bay

REVIEWER FLAG
⚠️
The Error Mixing composite deck details (with shear studs) and non-composite form deck details in the same bay without EOR direction. Reviewers flag this immediately as a structural non-conformance.
✅
Correct Practice Clearly differentiate composite deck from non-composite on plan sheets. Label each bay consistently with the structural framing plan. Do not mix composite and non-composite details in the same bay without explicit EOR direction and approval.
Mixing composite and non-composite details in the same bay without EOR direction is a common submittal error that reviewers flag immediately. Clearly differentiate and label each bay consistently with the structural framing plan.
DO NOT ASSUME

State Gauge, Grade, and Coating Explicitly

Do not assume gauge, grade, or coating based on industry defaults. The shop drawing must call out design thickness, ASTM reference, steel grade, and galvanizing specification explicitly. Coating must match the project specification, not just common practice.

Explicit callouts required The shop drawing must call out: design gauge and minimum delivered thickness per SDI Table 1.2; ASTM A1008 or A653 reference; ASTM grade (Fy = 33 ksi standard, 40 or 50 ksi for high-strength); galvanizing (G-60 interior, G-90 or prime-painted for corrosive/exposed). Assumptions lead to non-conformance. State everything explicitly.
✓

The Profile, Gauge & Material Verification Principle

The first checkpoint confirms that the deck specified in the structural drawings is exactly what is being detailed. Verify the profile designation (2VLI, 3VLI, 1.5B, 3N, etc.) matches the structural specification exactly—record SDI designation and manufacturer catalog reference in the title block. Specify the design gauge and confirm minimum delivered thickness per SDI Table 1.2 tolerances—call out both design thickness and ASTM A1008 or A653 reference explicitly. Confirm ASTM grade (Fy = 33 ksi standard; 40 or 50 ksi for high-strength) and galvanizing (G-60 interior; G-90 or prime-painted for corrosive/exposed)—coating must match project specification, not industry default. Clearly differentiate composite deck (with shear studs) from non-composite (form deck only)—label each bay consistently with the structural framing plan; mixing composite and non-composite details in the same bay without EOR direction is a common submittal error that reviewers flag immediately. Mismatches in profile, gauge, or steel grade are the most fundamental errors—and the easiest to catch early.

Step 2 · Structural Coordination

Structural Coordination & Load Path Confirmation

Before a deck layout is finalized, every framing location, orientation, elevation, bearing condition, and slab assumption must be reconciled with the structural design. This coordination step confirms that the deck shop drawing reflects the intended load path from deck to framing and ultimately into the supporting structure.

Load Path Confirmation

Framing → Deck → Slab → Structure

VERIFY BEFORE SUBMITTAL
Framing
Beam / Joist
→
Deck
Span + Bearing
→
Slab
Thickness + Fill
→
Design
Load Path
Coordination Checkpoints

Five Conditions That Must Align

Checkpoint 01

Framing Plan Alignment

FP

Every beam, girder, and joist shown on the structural framing plan must appear on the deck layout plan with the correct centerline location, member designation, and top-of-steel (TOS) elevation. Discrepancies between the structural drawings and the deck shop drawings are a primary cause of submittal rejection. Overlay the framing plan digitally if possible; confirm all member sizes match and that the deck span direction aligns with the structural intent.

Overlay check: Compare member locations, designations, sizes, TOS elevations, and deck span direction before advancing the layout.
Checkpoint 02

Span Direction and Deck Orientation

SD

Deck ribs must run in the direction shown or implied by the structural framing — perpendicular to the primary framing for composite floor systems. Verify that the span-to-depth ratio is within the SDI-recommended range for the profile selected. Where deck spans are long or loads are heavy, check that the gauge satisfies deflection limits under construction loads (wet concrete + live load) per SDI DDM04.

Orientation check: Confirm rib direction, selected profile, span-to-depth relationship, gauge, and construction-stage deflection requirements.
Checkpoint 03

Camber Coordination

CAM

For beams with specified camber, confirm that the deck detail accounts for the elevation differential at midspan. Deck sheets must not be shown as flat across a cambered beam — the TOS elevation at midspan will differ from the ends, and this affects the concrete fill depth, slab thickness, and total dead load calculation. Coordinate with the structural engineer on camber values before finalizing deck layouts.

Ends
Confirm end TOS elevations.
Midspan
Account for cambered elevation and resulting fill depth.
Checkpoint 04

Reactions and Bearing Lengths

BRG

Confirm deck end bearing length meets the minimum required by SDI — typically 1.5 inches on steel framing and 3.5 inches on concrete or masonry. Short bearing conditions at re-entrant corners, cantilever ends, and skewed framing must be explicitly called out and reinforced if below minimums. Verify that beam flange widths are sufficient to accommodate the deck end lap plus any fastener edge distance requirements.

Bearing Review
Steel framing: typically 1.5"  |  Concrete or masonry: typically 3.5"
Checkpoint 05

Slab Thickness and Concrete Fill

SLB

The total slab thickness (deck rib height + concrete topping above top of rib) must match the structural design documents. Verify that the concrete normal-weight or lightweight designation matches the structural specification — this affects shear stud design, composite section properties, and fire rating. Slab thickness tolerances per ACI 117 should be noted for field reference.

Design linkage: Rib height + topping depth, concrete weight classification, shear studs, composite properties, fire rating, and ACI 117 tolerances must remain coordinated.
FINAL
Submittal Gate

Request the Final Stamped Structural Framing Plan

Always request a final stamped structural framing plan before issuing the deck shop drawing for submittal. Preliminary plans lead to preliminary — and rejected — shop drawings.

Submission principle: Finalize the deck only after the structural reference documents are final, coordinated, and approved for detailing use.

Floor Deck Submittal Review

Step 3 — Connection Details, Fastening Patterns & Edge Conditions

Connection and fastening details are where floor deck submittals most frequently fail review. These must be explicit, dimensioned, and fully coordinated with the structural and architectural drawings.

Puddle Welds & Power-Actuated Fasteners

Specify the fastening type (puddle weld or PAF), diameter, and attachment pattern for deck-to-structure connections. SDI standard minimum is typically a 36/5 pattern unless modified by the engineer. Interior supports, end supports, and perimeter members often require different spacing and must be shown independently. Sidelap fastening methods, whether button-punch or screw-fastened, must also be identified because diaphragm capacity depends directly on the fastening pattern provided.

Sidelap Connections

Sidelap fasteners, whether button punches, screws, or welds, must be detailed at the spacing required to achieve diaphragm shear strength. Interior floor areas commonly permit larger spacing than perimeter diaphragm zones and collector regions. Both general notes and plan-specific callouts should identify siding connection type and spacing wherever conditions change. Missing sidelap information remains one of the most common diaphragm review comments.

Pour Stops & Deck Edge Closures

Every exposed slab edge that receives concrete must include a pour stop or engineered form edge shown in both plan and section. Call out pour stop gauge, commonly 14 or 16 gauge, required height matching slab thickness, and attachment method. Deck flute closures at open ribs prevent concrete blowout and must be detailed at supports, wall lines, and exposed deck ends. Closure plates and cellular deck end closures should also be coordinated where applicable.

Cantilever and Re-entrant Corners

Cantilevered deck regions require special detailing because negative bending typically governs design. These areas often require heavier deck gauges and enhanced reinforcement. Re-entrant corners create significant stress concentrations and must include supplemental reinforcing bars, strap anchors, or other Engineer of Record requirements. Unique edge conditions should never be left to field determination; each condition requires a dedicated keyed detail within the submittal package.

Submittal Review Checklist

✓
Key Cantilever Conditions
✓
Show Pour Stops & Closures
✓
Detail Sidelap Connections
✓
Verify Fastener Pattern

Step 04 • Openings • Penetrations • Final Review

Step 4 — Openings, Penetrations & Final Submittal Checklist

Final Coordination Gate
Coordinate Openings
→
Verify Standards
→
Final Check
Opening Coordination

Deck Openings and Penetrations

All penetrations — mechanical, electrical, plumbing, structural, and architectural — must be shown in the deck layout plan with accurate dimensions and locations. Small openings (typically ≤ 4.5 inches per SDI) may be cut in the field within rib valleys without reinforcing, but this must be called out explicitly. Medium openings (4.5–12 inches) require header angles or supplemental framing. Large openings (>12 inches or spanning full ribs) require structural framing — a trimmer beam or additional joist — and full coordination with the structural drawings.

Opening Classification

Detail the Opening According to Its Size

≤ 4.5"
Small Opening
May be cut in the field within rib valleys without reinforcing, but this must be called out explicitly.
4.5–12"
Medium Opening
Require header angles or supplemental framing.
> 12"
Large Opening
Large openings (>12 inches or spanning full ribs) require structural framing — a trimmer beam or additional joist — and full coordination with the structural drawings.
For Every Opening

Show Enough Information to Verify Coordination

For each opening, show: plan dimensions, distance from nearest grid line, header/trimmer reinforcing, and concrete edge treatment. Cross-reference to the mechanical and architectural drawings by revision number so reviewers can confirm coordination.

Location Data
Plan dimensions
Distance from nearest grid line
Structural Treatment
Header/trimmer reinforcing
Concrete edge treatment
Standards Documentation

Code References and Standards

The submittal cover sheet must list the applicable standards and editions: SDI DDM04 (Floor Deck Design Manual), AISC 360, IBC (current adopted edition), ACI 318 for composite slab design, and any project-specific amendments. If the project is in a jurisdiction with local structural amendments, cite them. Fire-resistance rating for the floor assembly must be noted with the applicable UL design number — this is particularly critical for steel deck in Type I and Type II construction.

SDI DDM04
AISC 360
IBC
ACI 318
UL Design Number
Before Transmittal

Final Pre-Submittal Checklist

01
Title block complete: project name, address, EOR name, deck manufacturer, drawing number, revision
02
All plan sheets at consistent scale with north arrow and grid lines matching structural drawings
03
General notes include deck gauge, grade, coating, concrete weight, and fastener schedule
04
All openings dimensioned, reinforced, and cross-referenced
05
Pour stops and flute closures shown at all perimeter conditions
06
Diaphragm fastener patterns per zone (field, edge, corner)
07
Section and detail keys match all keyed conditions in plan
08
Structural engineer's review comments from previous submittals incorporated and cloud-marked
09
Submittal transmittal form completed with specification section reference
Review Failure Points

Common Rejection Reasons — At a Glance

Missing penetration reinforcing
Openings shown in plan without header angles, trimmer beams, or reinforcing bars called out.
Profile, gauge, or composite designation differs between plan notes and title block.
Inconsistent deck designation
No sidelap fastener schedule
Deck-to-deck sidelap connections omitted entirely — diaphragm capacity cannot be confirmed.
Beam or joist locations on deck plan do not match the current structural framing plan revision.
Framing plan mismatch
Edge conditions undetailed
Pour stops, closure plates, and cantilever edges left to "field verify" with no keyed details.
30
Minutes
Internal Review

Use this checklist as a final gate before transmittal. A 30-minute internal review against this list prevents a 2-week review cycle.

Final Submittal Gate

Coordinate Everything Before You Transmit Anything

Opening geometry, reinforcement, deck designation, fastening, perimeter details, drawing references, applicable standards, and previous review comments should all agree before the package leaves the detailing team. A complete internal review is far faster than another external review cycle.

What's Your Reaction?

like

dislike

love

funny

angry

sad

wow